Who can serve communion?

In the last four years our elders have had discussions about who can serve the ordinances, such as communion and baptism? Is it only pastors? Only elders? Only deacons? Only members? Can a woman serve? Can a person with un-reconciled sin serve? Can a non-Christian serve?

This has been a conversation of late because we are planning to do communion a little differently this coming Sunday (see the end of this post).  For now, let us look at each of the questions above and run them through the filter of Scripture.

We use Scripture as our filter because God is the ultimate authority and because God is the author of Scripture; therefore, Scripture is the authoritative Word of God (2 Timothy 3:16-17).  Scripture trumps Traditions of men.  In the Christian Church one of the biggest mistakes Christian leadership has made over the last 2,000 years is to say that the Traditions of the Church have equal authority with the Scriptures.  And so what can sometimes occur is people make up a rule about how to do church and then that rule becomes a tradition and people do it because it is what they have always ever done.  For example, some would say only a Pastor, elder, or deacon can serve communion or baptize people.

But is this true?

Let us run this through the filter of Scripture: do the Scriptures say only Pastors, elders, or deacons can administer the ordinances? I can’t find a Scripture that says only these officers are allowed to baptize and serve communion.

What about members of a church, can they serve communion? Again, I don’t see anything in Scripture that says a member is prohibited from serving communion.  When we read Acts 2:42 or 1 Corinthians 11:17-26, these Scriptures describe what is happening during church gatherings, but they do not tell us who is breaking the bread and serving the wine.  We assume the leaders are doing this, or at minimum that the people serving are doing so in conjunction with the leadership’s approval.  But in these two verses it does not say only Pastors, elders, or deacons can serve.

About Baptism, same as communion, in Scripture there are not explicit instructions about which Christians are or are not allowed to baptize new believers.

What about women baptizing? What about a woman serving communion? To this I ask, where in Scripture does it say a woman can not?

What about a Christian with un-reconciled sin? When it comes to communion the very purpose of communion is to get Christians to come together, confess their sin, be in right relationship with one another, and look to the cross of Christ.  In 1 Cor. 11:17-34 there are instructions about un-confessed sin and communion.  So before a Christian serves another Christian communion, each Christian needs to deal with their own sin issues through confession and then communion can be served.  Jesus takes this one step further when He instructs people to leave the alter, be reconciled, then come and worship (Matthew 5:23-26).  Jesus is not talking about communion in Matthew 5, but I think we can extract a principle from this passage that jives with Paul’s instructions in 1 Corinthians 11.

What about non-Christians serving people? Well, why would a non-Christian partake in an ordinance they don’t believe in? Besides, 1 Cor. 11:27-32 applies in this situation in that when a person takes of communion in an unworthy manner, he or she eats and drinks judgment unto himself (herself).

So based on Scripture, what we know for sure is that Christians in good standing within a church community can serve communion or baptize.  We assume these Christians should be working with the leadership to make sure they are not doing anything counter to the leadership (Hebrews 13:17).  And we assume the leadership is overseeing what is happening to make sure those serving understand the purpose of communion and baptism theologically.

The plan for Grace Church this Sunday is for one of our Home Communities to serve communion.  This breaks with our tradition of Pastors, elders, and men only serving.  But Scripturally our elders do not see that there is anything wrong with Christian lay-people in good standing (both men and women) serving communion.

GODSPEED

For more on how the first century church did church and how you can be involved in a disciple-making movement today, read my Doctoral Thesis entitled — Recontextualizing Church: From Attractional Events and Program-Driven, to Missional Community and Cell-Driven 

Church Discipline and Excommunication by R.C. Sproul

The following article is from R.C. Sproul about the role of church discipline, instituted by Jesus, for the purpose of the church to live by God’s holy standards so that the church will reflect His morals and goodness to the world.

“Making Christian disciples involves a whole range of activities for nurture, instruction, and training. To produce mature disciples, Christian learning, devotion, worship, righteousness, and service, are all to be taught in the context of care and accountability (Matt. 18:28:20; John 21:15-17; 2 Tim. 2:14-26; Titus 2; Heb. 13:17) among the other believers. Not abstractly, but in this context reformed theology has emphasized the importance of church discipline as the official procedures of the church permitting it to define its membership and maintain its standards of belief and practice, derived from the Bible.

“Since believers are required to be holy, unspotted by the morals of the world, the church itself is separated from the world, and it is necessary to define the boundary between the world and the church. The New Testament clearly shows that in the whole context of church life judicial procedures have a significant place for the health of churches and individuals (1 Cor. 5:1-13; 2 Cor. 2:5-11; 2 Thess. 3:6, 14, 15; Titus 1:10-14; 3:9-11).

“Jesus instituted church discipline by authorizing the apostles to prohibit or permit certain kinds of behavior; this is the power of “binding” and “loosing” sins (Matt. 18:18; John 20:23). The “keys of the kingdom,” first given to Peter and find as power to bind and loose (Matt. 16:19), Have usually been understood as authority to oversee doctrine and impose discipline. This authority was given by Christ to the church in general and to its ordained leadership in particular.

“The Westminster confession (30.3) explains:

“Church censures are necessary, for the reclaiming in gaining of offending brethren, for deterring of others from the like offenses, for purging out of that leaven which might infect the whole lump, for vindicating the honor of Christ, and the holy profession of the gospel, and for preventing the wrath of God, which might justly fall upon the church, if they should suffer His covenant, and the seals thereof [the sacraments] to be profaned by notorious and obstinate offenders.

“Church censures may have to escalate from admonition through exclusion from the Lords supper to expulsion from the congregation (excommunication), which is described as handing a person over to Satan, the prince of this world (Matt. 18:15-17; 1 Cor. 5:1-5, 11; 1 Tim. 1:20; Titus 3:10, 11). Public sins (that is, those that are open to the whole church’s view) should be publicly corrected in the church’s presence (1 Tim. 5:20; cf. Gal. 2:11-14). Jesus teaches a procedure for dealing privately with those who have given personal offense, and hope that it will not be necessary to ask for the church in public censure of them (Matt. 18:15-17).

“The purpose of church censure in all its forms is not to punish for punishment’s sake, but to call forth repentance and so recover the straying sheep. Ultimately, there is only one sin for which a church member is excommunicated—impenitence. When repentance is apparent, the church is to declare the sin remitted and receive the offender into fellowship once again.”

R.C. Sproul Church Discipline and Excommunicationin The Reformation Study Bible, ESV, p. 1391

Sermon notes from Imago Dei: (powerful message)

Acts 2:42-47

“And they devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and the fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers. And awe came upon every soul, and many wonders and signs were being done through the apostles. And all who believed were together and had all things in common. And they were selling their possessions and belongings and distributing the proceeds to all, as any had need. And day by day, attending the temple together and breaking bread in their homes, they received their food with glad and generous hearts, praising God and having favor with all the people. And the Lord added to their number day by day those who were being saved.”

Starting in v. 42, “They devoted themselves to…” — we may take up Christianity for six months kind of like we take up tennis for six months and then we put it down. And then we pick it up again or pick up some other hobby. But then when we live this way, Christianity becomes marginalized. Jesus didn’t take us up for a moment, Jesus took us up for a lifetime into eternal life.

Acts 2:42 is like a mirror to evaluate our faith and commitment. The first thing that they devoted themselves to was the Apostles’ teaching which means commitment to a community of practice — to do what you say that you believe, which is what the apostles learned from Jesus — that Jesus is the fulfillment of the Old Testament, He is Christ the Lord, the hope of the world. The New Testament is the the written version of the Apostles’ teaching. There is nothing equal to it or above it in terms of authority of doctrine and practice.

In our culture Scripture is marginalized, even sometimes within the church. The study done at Imago Dei shows that only 29% of those who attend this church read their Bible every day. And only 59% go to church every Sunday. And so devotion to church and the reading of the word becomes marginalized.

Some in the survey at Imago wanted more fellowship, more activity and leas of the word. And they commented that they thought that this may cause the church to grow more. Rick McKinley said, “Perhaps it would be more fun and perhaps we would grow more, but without scripture I don’t know what we are gathering for. I didn’t grow up in the church, but if Jesus didn’t die for my sins to save be and bring me into a community centered on that point, I don’t know why we are here? To drink beer and watch football in the name of Jesus? Is that the central focus of fellowship, in the Spirit? Or is that affinity?” Being a church comes down to devotion to Jesus’ teachings lived out in practice as a community.

The second thing they devoted themselves to is fellowship. This is primarily fellowship of the Spirit. Are you looking for fellowship in the Spirit? Or affinity? Diversity is a sign of fellowship in the Spirit. You can find affinity anywhere, but affinity isn’t necessarily based on what the Holy Spirit is doing within a group of people. But when fellowship is based on what the Spirit is doing in a group of people, then God is working amongst a group of people to practice the life of Jesus, which was His intent for the church.

The third thing that they devoted themselves to was the breaking of bread. The breaking of bread, more or less, is the practice of hospitality. This is not simply taking a piece of bread and dipping it into a cup of grape juice. This is gathering around the table with Jesus at the center. In other words, this kind of fellowship of the Spirit generates sharing in worship. This is a sign of the fellowship of the Spirit. And fellowship of the Spirit produces the fourth thing that they devoted themselves to, which was prayer.

And so practicing hospitality with Jesus at the center is a sign that the Holy Spirit is at work amongst a group of people. And diversity is a sign that the Holy Spirit is at work amongst a group of people to practice the lifestyle of Jesus. And it results in a practice of generosity, “they had everything in common.” (Acts 2:44) This is another sign of fellowship and breaking of bread. The early Christians were people who were experiencing real need, real loss. And so if someone had extra and they saw that someone had need, and then they shared with the one who had need, they were practicing what Jesus taught. In other words we are to become a practicing community.

We are not a community of philosophizing about practicing Jesus’ teachings. Often Americans come together in a small group and they talk about practice instead of actually practicing. We talk about what the Greek word means to practice hospitality. We talk about what it might look like if we have two coats and someone has zero and we were to give them one of our coats. But then the question arises: what if I have 12 coats? Or what if I live in a culture where nobody needs a coat? But then we miss the point.

In philosophizing we talk about practicing but we don’t actually practice the ways of Jesus. And so devoting themselves to the apostles teaching, the fellowship, the breaking of bread, and prayer has the purpose to become a practicing community. This is what church is about. And we are to be devoted not to one church for six months, and then another church for three months, and then the church that has a better youth ministry, and then the one that has a good children’s program, and then the one that has inspiring music, and then the one that has a different preacher. We are to be devoted to one in particular church where we can be seen, known, and enjoy fellowship of the Spirit, which results in a practicing community.

When church is about consumerism, then we never experience becoming a practice in community. We never experience the true fellowship that comes about through true devotion to the theology and practice of Jesus in community.

*Home Communities (HC) are to be about practice, HCs are not a place to talk about practice.*

In Acts 2:42, “They devoted themselves to the Apostles’ teaching…” is practice, not talking.

*Sunday mornings gives us theological direction, HCs are the place to put it into practice.*

The question of practice comes down to our view of possessions. Do our possessions possess us? or does Jesus possess us? If our possessions possess us, then we will use our time to gain more and more possessions. We will pick up tennis for six months and then pick up some other hobby for another few months and we will always be looking for what is going to fill us. It will be about affinity, about consumerism. But when we realize that when Jesus became our Lord and Savior, he picked us up permanently. We are his. And He desires for us to live like He lived with His disciples. Which is why devotion to the Apostles’ teaching is about learning to use our possessions to meet the needs of Jesus’ people. That is a major part of what church is about.

The moment we are in in our culture is a moment in which we need to have perspective. What do you value as an individual? What do you value as a family? Is it achievement? Or is it Jesus Christ?

Pastor Rick told a story of valuing baseball as a family. He and a friend had boys that were the same age, and they each worked together to coach their Little League baseball team. And one of the boys was really good and had it as his goal to become a major league baseball player. So they spent a ton of time trying to do year-round baseball for years and years and years and years, until their sons were in high school and they were sitting in the sanctuary before the worship service talking— one of their sons was in the other room chilling and the other one was up on stage practicing for worship—they realized that neither of their sons was playing baseball anymore. And then they realized how much time they had devoted to year-round baseball just to get them to the point where they didn’t want to play anymore. And so Rick McKinley said, “you need perspective, what are you devoted to?”

So what does it look like for us to be possessed by Jesus and not our stuff? What does it mean to devote to fellowship of Jesus in the Spirit instead of affinity…to live the life of Jesus that He intended in “church” community? It’s more than playing church, it’s Christ is our life! We are His. Devoted to His ways and His community.

As you come to the table today, this is a moment to allow the Spirit to show us our sin, and to yield ourselves to the Father. To allow His love to saturate us because of our identity in Christ, and our devotion to Him, and to allow the Holy Spirit to be at work within us to show us what we are truly devoted to, and to confess our sins so that we allow Jesus to possess us as He already does by faith in Christ’s finished worked on the cross. But to allow Him to permeate our lives in such a way to be devoted to Him in one local fellowship of the Spirit called church.

A Mini Revival Afoot

I believe a mini-revival is afoot at Grace Church Seattle.

How do I know? Well, there are signs.  I will not say what is happening or when or how, but simply share from two articles about how we know the Holy Spirit is at work.

First, you cannot tell if the Spirit is at work based on the external signs such as spiritual wonders, tongues, visions, etc.  Those all may be manifestations of God, but they can also be faked (they can be manifested by something other worldly that is spiritual but is not of the Holy Spirit).

So how can you know if the Spirit is moving? Joel Comiskey (in Spirit Filled Small Groups) states that the fruit of the Spirit will be evident: love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, gentleness, and self-control (Gal. 5:22-23).  The enemy will try to shut this down, but those with the Holy Spirit in them and by the power of Jesus’ name will not succumb to the devil’s scheming, but will be like a tree planted near water whose roots run deep and thus when the scorching desert wind blows, the leaves remain green and full of life (Jeremiah 17:7-8).

A second way we can know the Spirit is moving is based on Jonathan Edwards book about the 1742 Great Awakening The Distinguishing Marks of the Work of the Spirit of God.  Edwards points us to 1 John 4, and states there are five positive measures (or marks).  One, peoples love for Jesus will be elevated.  Two, the Holy Spirit will operate against sin and the work of the devil (i.e., conviction and repentance of sin).  Three, there will be a greater regard for the holy Scriptures.  Four, truth will be heard and resonate with those hearing from God.  Five, there will be an increased love for God and therefore our fellow brothers and sisters in Christ.

I am seeing increased love for Jesus in our church, increased repentance of sin, increased desire to read and know the Word of God, increased desire to know truth, and increased love for God and people.

A third way we can know the Holy Spirit is at work…there is a general feeling, a buzz, an excitement.

As your pastor, I felt the Lord lay this all on my heart to let you know what I am seeing. Again, I may be wrong, but don’t we all desire this to be truth?

GODSPEED

 

 

Why come under Jesus’ Lordship?

Our goal at Grace Church Seattle is to reach seekers and unbelievers with the gospel of Jesus Christ. We who call on the name of the Lord for salvation are also called to make Jesus our Lord.  Making Jesus the Lord of your life is without question the goal of Christianity.  The goal is not your salvation alone.  The goal is not your comfort.  The goal is the glory of God and our enjoyment of a right relationship with Him through Jesus Christ.  And this only happens as we place ourselves under His Lordship.
.
We each are called to come under Jesus’ Lordship. But you will always feel like this is about rules so long as you misunderstand the gospel.  You will always feel like leadership is communicating like Pharisees until you understand the very meaning of the word gospel.
.
The english word “gospel” is “euangelizo,” which looks like the word “evangelize,” doesn’t it? That’s because it is the word to evangelize, but it means so much more.  It literally means “to tell the good news” or to evangelize about who is Lord.
.
In the Greek culture, to evangelize was to tell people that the Roman Emperor is Lord.  This was considered a statement of fact, and if you didn’t like it too bad, he was Lord.  To disrespect him as Lord (to speak ill of Caesar) or ignore his lordship (to disobey the rules of the Roman Empire) was treason, and warranted consequence.  The first century Roman citizen did not have the option to deny allegiance to the Emperor.  So when the Emperor would die and a new Emperor would be established, the heralds (preachers) would “evangelize” (or share the gospel) that there was a new Caesar.  Or if the Emperor changed a law, the heralds would evangelize so that everyone would be informed and comply with the news rules or decrees of the Empire.
.
Now take the above historical context and apply this to Jesus Christ.  The Gospel of Jesus is that He is Christ the Lord, and therefore all other “lords” or “emperors” or “kings” or “masters” are not; rather, Jesus is Lord and deserving of our allegiance.
.
This is either true, or it is not true.  If it is true, then no matter your religion or political persuasion, you are accountable for your response to the declaration: Jesus is Christ and Lord.  In other words, if Jesus really did rise from the grave and if He really is seated at the right hand of God the Father, then there are consequences for all human beings for their belief or disbelief.  If you disbelieve (and this is true), then you will go about your daily life but face consequences upon death and the day of reckoning.  If you believe, then you are called to conform your life to this belief.  The biblical word for believe is synonymous with trust and obedience.  So to believe Jesus is Lord and Savior to get salvation and not conform your life to His Lordship is to actively disbelieve even though you say you believe.  Even the demons believe and shudder (James 2:19).  Truly regenerating belief results in change of lifestyle because the Lord of one’s heart has transitioned from self or some other god to the Lord of the universe (Titus 3:4-8).
.
How does this related to the state of Grace Church Seattle? (i.e., what must we do with this information?)
.
We are called as a church — as individual citizens of heaven who on this earth come together for worship and ministry as a local body called Grace Church Seattle — to come under the Lordship of Jesus Christ as a community.
.
This is from the top-down and bottom-up.
.
Our leadership has been praying more in the last few years than we ever have.
.
Our leadership has been seeking the Lord’s vision for Grace Church to come under Jesus’ Lordship and follow His lead and His vision for Grace.
.
Our leadership has sought the Lord’s vision related to children’s ministry, youth ministry, Home Communities, worship on Sunday’s, investing in leader development, the investment in our worship director, the hiring of our newest pastor — and we believe we have heard of the Lord as we continue to move forward.
.
Now there is one thing that has been pressed on my heart that I believe is from the Lord for Grace Church — we need to unite to go out and evangelize.
.
I hear fear and trepidation when I speak with people about sharing the gospel.  It is true we have a psycho public school philosophy in Seattle that is scary for parents who need to make decisions if they should place their children in that environment; it is true that the morality of Seattle has shifted to the extreme progressive-liberal left since 2012 and Christians are smaller than a minority voice; it is true it has become very difficult to stand for the morality of Jesus in everyday conversations at work or on social media; and it is true that our families are facing enormous pressures financially, which cause stress in marriages and a current church-wide feeling amongst many women that they are under some kind of spiritual attack.  And I am sure there are many other crazy insights you or I could share, here, that would make us all feel like it is time to panic.  But as I sit, typing away, I feel a calm and the need to say — Jesus is Lord!
.
He can identify with you because He lived this life as a human being.  He faced trials and temptation and yet was without sin.  He stayed the course and achieved victory over sin – all the way to His death, for you.  And…He…was…raised!
.
You are a citizen of heaven and as Jesus is, so you will also be (1 Corinthians 15:22-23, 49).  You are a citizen of heaven, and His power resides in you through the deposit of the Holy Spirit (Ephesians 1:13; 2 Corinthians 1:22).  You are a citizen of heaven, and you will be transformed by His power when He comes, and until then we are to live…as… citizens…of…heaven (Philippians 3:20-21).
.
Don’t cower.
.
Don’t run by moving to another city with cheaper housing and conservative politics.
.
We are not called to have a Christ-Against-Culture mentality.  We are called to have a Christ-Transformer-of-Culture mentality. The Apostle Paul didn’t strategize to change the Roman Empire by heralding the gospel in the countryside.  He went to the city-center.  Like the hub of a bicycle wheel that transfers power from the center through the spokes to the rim where the rubber meets the road, so also the morality of our culture flows from city-centers to the rest of culture.

Seattle is a big hub.
.
This is why I feel called to Seattle. To impact and influence culture-changers. And I feel called to ask you, to compel you, to work with me to be a culture-changer.  Every sermon I preach doesn’t just have the goal to expound what the text says, rather every sermon has the goal to show you and your friends (believers or unbelievers) how the Gospel of Jesus — calling for our allegiance to His Lordship — makes us culture-changers.
.
Like I said, the goal of Christianity is not your comfort, not even your salvation (which is a primary goal and a huge part of what we do, but that is not the end); rather the goal of Christianity is transformed people who are under the Lordship of Jesus Christ and who make a real difference in this world.  And so I feel compelled to call for us, the committed at Grace Church, to band together in unity to become outward focused.
.
This will be the thrust of our vision and focus beginning in August as we prepare for the fall and as we gear up for the fruitfulness that I believe is ahead.
.
– 1 Corinthians 15:58
.
GODSPEED

What is Lent?

I went to a pastor’s meeting in West Seattle yesterday and saw a smudge on the forehead of a fellow pastor and thought, “What the heck?” and then remembered it was Ash Wednesday.

What is Lent?

The word “Lent” comes from an old Anglo-Saxon word for springtime, lencten.  This describes the gradual lengthening of days in the spring following the winter solstice. Lent has no meaning in itself other than to prepare us for Easter and new life in Christ. About a month and a half after Christmas, six weeks before Easter, the Church has historically begun Lent on Ash Wednesday.  Ashes of burned palm leaves from the previous year’s Palm Sunday and marked on the forehead of repentant sinners.  The following is how this tradition developed over time.

By the 2nd and 3rd century AD, Christians prepared for Easter as the holiest time of the year.  This was done in private because Christianity was not a legal religion in the Roman Empire until the beginning of the fourth century.

In the early church, baptism of new believers was in associated with the Easter Vigil. Because wolves in sheep’s clothing were intentionally trying to gain membership in the church to lead people astray, preparation for baptism took three years in the early church.  Christians were given catechesis instruction in doctrine (the Greek Katechein means “to teach”).  They were instructed to withdrawal from pagan practices and loyalties and they were taught in the new “way” of Christianity.  In the year they were admitted for candidacy of baptism and membership, during Lent they were instructed to engage in fasting and abstinence in preparation for the Easter season at which time they would be baptized into Christ and the new community (the “Church”) on Easter Sunday.

In the 4th to the 7th century AD, the Lenten season began on Ash Wednesday in preparation for Holy Thursday, some six weeks prior to Easter.  Preparation for baptism was joined by fasting and other practices for absolution from public sins and crimes. The goal became purity of the Church.  In the 7th century, the custom of the Catholic Church was for confessing sinners to be presented publicly before the Bishop and “expelled” from the congregation to symbolized the expulsion of Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden (“you are dust, to dust you will return” in Gen. 3:19).  They would thus live in “quarantine” for the forty days of Lent, abstaining from meat, alcohol, bathing, haircuts, shaves, marriage relations, and business transactions.  This was all in anticipation of of absolution on Holy Thursday, before Easter, which commemorates the Last Supper of Jesus our Lord.

In the Middle Ages, the emphasis was placed on personal rather than public sin.  As a result, traditions of Ash Wednesday were mitigated in such a way to incorporate all adults of the parish.  The emphasis was for all confessing Christians (those who claim to be believers) to “turn away from sin and be faithful to the gospel” (see Mark 1:15).

Three traditions have characterized Lent: (1) a somber atmosphere; (2) fasting and abstinence; and (3) devotions centered around the suffering Messiah.

Fasting and abstinence are two different disciplines.  Fasting is not a literal 40 day fast of no food.  Rather the purpose is to limit the quantity and quality of food during this time.   Actual fasting from food can take place during this season, but should be for a limited time.  When one feels the hunger pains, devote those moments to prayer.  Abstinence refers to the kind of food and drink one denies. For example meat and alcohol.  This promotes self-discipline and supports one’s prayers.  It cleanses oneself of previous abuse and sin.

Alms-giving and giving are promoted in conjunction with the discipline of fasting and abstinence.  The idea is to give of one’s surplus to help the needy or to help a mission.

It should be noted that fasting and abstinence is a voluntary practice.  All of Lent and the traditions that surround Lent do not save, they only remind us and point us to the One who does, Jesus Christ.

By grace you have been saved, through faith in Jesus Christ and not of your own works (like Lent) so that no one will boast (Eph. 2:8-9).  We are to boast in the Lord alone.  Lent simply reminds us of Christ’s suffering on our behalf and prepares us for the season that the gospel is most prevalent, Good Friday and Easter.

GODSPEED

Tongues, Prophecy, Communion

Let me tell you a story.  When I was growing up the primary religious influences in my life were my dad and the Palmer family.
.
My dad was Catholic and growing up with him, mass was a weekly (Sundays) if not a daily discipline.  I lamented going to church in the fall, especially when there was an early Broncos game.  All I wanted to do was watch football.  But my dad would make it a priority to attend mass at St. Joseph’s or St. John’s.  To him, spending time with the Lord in meditation at a Cathedral was mystical.  Taking of the Eucharist, for him, had power and was a means of grace.
.
I remember saying to my dad when I was about five, on an Easter Sunday right after going to a Sunrise service, “Dad, why do we have to go to church again? We just went to church!” My father said, “Son, because I love God.”  I thought to myself, “But don’t you love me?”  So I blurted out these words in the best way a five year old knew how.  I felt competition with God; I wanted my dad all to myself.  And he said to me a few words that will always stick, “Son, of course I love you; but I love God more.  And so we will go to Easter service today.”  It was a holy moment.  As I backed out of my father’s room, I remember thinking, “If my dad loves me so much, but loves God more, then God must be important.”
.
I still didn’t understand the gospel of Jesus Christ.  I remember going to a Catholic bookstore with my dad.  There was a children’s book with pictures.  I picked it up and leafed through the pictures only to open to a page of a bloody man on a cross.  I felt like I needed to throw up.  “If religion is good,” I reasoned, “then why does a Catholic bookstore have a picture of a bloody man?”
.
At age eight, I was introduced to the gospel by my friends on the way to soccer practice.  They asked if I knew for certain if I was going to heaven.  I had no idea what they were talking about.  They explained, “This is where you go when you die to be with God.”  I said, “What if I don’t want to go there?”  They said, “Then you go to hell.”  I asked, “What’s hell?”  They explained it was a lake of fire and eternal suffering for sin.  My heart started beating fast.  I asked, “What’s sin?”  They said, “Bad things we do like swearing and stuff.”  I had a potty mouth, so I knew I was headed straight for hell.  I asked, “How can I make sure I go to heaven?”  They said, “You need to meet Jesus.”  Now, let me say that this is a strange way for someone to explain the Gospel.  I literally thought I would meet a man named Jesus.
.
Now what does the above paragraph have to say about my Catholic upbringing?
.
So my friends invited me to their church for “AWANA” — which was like Christian Cub Scouts — so I could “meet” Jesus.  I went.  At the end they said, “If you want to meet Jesus, come forward.”  So I did.  They said, “Close your eyes.”  I thought, “Why? Is Jesus gonna jump out of a closet or something?”  Then they had us pray.  I was so confused.
.
The next day my friends invited me to their home.  We lived in the mountains and so the shortcut from the bus stop was 3/4ths of a mile straight up hill, and it involved some rock climbing.  Awesome childhood neighborhood to grow up in.  We stopped on the rocks.  The older brother asked, “Ryan, I saw you went forward to meet Jesus; what did you think?”  I said, “Well, AWANA was fun, but Jesus never showed up.”  He said, “Oh, that’s cause He died 2,000 years ago.”  I was like, “If he died, how am I supposed to meet Him?”  He said, “Well, cause he raised from the dead.”  I said, “That’s impossible.”  Then he shared the whole gospel about Jesus being God’s Son, living a perfect life, dying on the cross, raising from the dead… As he explained this to me, the images from that book in the Catholic bookstore of a bloody man flashed through my mind.  All the images in the Catholic Churches I had gone to now made sense.  I said, “Oh, now I get it.”  And I accepted Christ as my Lord and Savior.
.
One of the strangest differences between my dad’s church and the Palmer’s church was communion.  At the Catholic Church, this is done every service and every day if you want.  And they made it into a big deal, as if your salvation is somewhat dependent on it.  But I can tell you, walking into Catholic Mass every Sunday I felt dirty, walking out I would feel cleansed and light on my feet.  At the Evangelical Free Church I attended with the Palmer’s, they only took communion once per month.  When they would pass it out, you would sit in your seat and they would bring you a tray with wafers and then a tray with small individual cups.  I always thought this was strange.  It didn’t have the same affect on me personally, or spiritually.  But at Catholic Mass we would come forward, individually receive a wafer from the Priest and then sip from the same cup, then go back to the pew and kneel.  It was powerful.
.
Theologically I never understood the difference until I went to Seminary.  Now I understand that Catholics teach that communion is a “means of grace” through which you literally have sins forgiven, as if this contributes to your salvation.
.
At Baptist churches and such, it is presented as more of a memorial, not a means of grace, but something we do symbolically to remember the gospel.
.
Theologically I agree with the Baptist idea, but the method of the Catholics (and Lutherans / Anglicans) still resonates with me.
.
The reason I am an Evangelical is because of what the Bible teaches on such topics.  We are saved only by faith in Christ alone, not by works.
.
Now, in college I faced a new challenge: tongues and prophecy.  I had been exposed to .Catholicism, Anglicanism, Lutheranism, Evangelical Free, Baptist, and Presbyterianism,  but there was one Christian group that has never made me feel completely comfortable.
.
I would say that each Christian faith has something profoundly good to contribute to all other Christian perspectives.  And each Christian faith has points of muddled confusion.  The main point of it all is Christ, do you believe that salvation is in Christ alone?
.
That being said, Catholicism has a really good point that we should be “one, catholic and apostolic Church.”  There is a reverence in the Catholic Church that I miss.  But, I would add, the gospel is not clear and in some cases is completely absent.
.
Anglicanism and Lutheranism have retained much of the reverence, and they have emphasized the gospel historically, but just like any other denomination there can been biblical churches and non-biblical churches (usually the split is between fundamentalist/ conservatives and social-gospel/progressives — I wish the best of both could be emphasized in every church).
.
Presbyterianism (and Methodism) both take a middle ground approach.  I like what the father (a Presbyterian Minister) in A River Runs Through It said when asked his thoughts on Methodism, “I like Methodists, they’re like Baptists who can read.”  This about says it all concerning these two forms of Evangelicalism.  They have wonderful systems of theology rooted in Calvin and Wesley’s teachings.  Methodism had at its beginning a wonderful method of ministry (small groups and the empowerment of lay ministers).  Calvinism changed Geneva Switzerland from being one of the most dangerous to one of the safest cities in the world.  I have so learned from both these Christian Traditions.
.
Baptists and Evangelical Free and Non-Denominational churches have the gospel down.  But for some reason the Baptists have a bad reputation.  And sadly the Non-Denoms are mostly Baptist churches without “Baptist” in the title.  There is a richness to the theology of these churches, and they get things done.  But I have found there is a fear of Holy Spirit movement and empowerment (especially in relation to the charismata).
.
I believe Christ is at the heart of all the above movements, denominations, associations, and that each appeals to a certain type of personality.  So long as Christ and the Scriptures are central, I believe these faiths are Christian.  All the way from the mystical to the liturgical, the high culture to the low culture, and Christ Transformer of Culture to Christ and Culture in Paradox.  But there is one element in all the above that is missing, room for being led of the Spirit.
.
I believe one reason many fundamentalists, evangelical, conservative Christians react against movements of the Spirit is because practice of the charismata is rarely taught.  When it is, in some cases, it can be abused.  This is what I observed in college.
.
When I was 20 years old, my girlfriend took me to a Bible study on campus.  The Pastor was solid and used the Word as his authority.  I learned under him.  We met weekly for three years and he discipled me, helped me through my struggles and crises of faith in college at a liberal “Christian” in name only college.  I was being taught in the religion classes that the Bible is a book full of contradictions and not the Word of God.  Thank you St. Olaf.  At the same time, praise God for a Pastor educated at Dallas Theological Seminary who answered my questions and was able to point me to articles and books in the library, which countered what my professors taught (i.e., just because a professor has a PhD, doesn’t mean he has pure motives — many of the professors of religion didn’t believe the Bible, hence I felt they were actively trying to dissuade me from believing; and I found that their arguments were often weak.  They raised good questions, but rarely gave us the answer.  And in my own research I found many of the answers and the rest of my questions were answered in Seminary).
.
So I am thankful for this Pastor.  And, half way through my Soph. year he began to expose me to Holy Spirit charismatic practices.  At first I reacted like I was interacting with a New Age / cultic pastor.  And some of the guest speakers were crazy, with limited understanding of theology (taking scripture out of context and spiritually manipulating people).  I trusted this pastor, for the most part, but I wouldn’t attend his church on Sundays because they spoke in tongues regularly.  I do have to say this Pastor was sold out for Jesus like no one I have ever met before or since.  And, I would say, I believe I did witness some things that were of the Spirit under his college ministry.  But there was crazy stuff as well.
.
Once a Prophet from Australia came and spoke to a group of about 400 people saying, “You need to be slain in the Spirit…tongues is a sign you’ve been slain…and being drunk in the Spirit is a manifestation.  Look at all these Scriptures, they show people falling down on their backs and shacking, convulsing…that’s normal.  So if you haven’t been slain in the Spirit, come here and I will blow in your ear the breath of the Spirit and you will fall and have this charismatic experience.”  At this event some 150 young people (under 20) formed a circle around the room and this prophet walked around, blew in their ears, and people fell and convulsed on the floor.  People were acting drunk and knocking over chairs.  It was wild.  I was scared.  My girlfriend went up.  Of the 150 students forming the circle, only 5 remained standing and would not fall.  I looked around at the teenagers convulsing on the floor and noticed some of them would stop, look around, and have a puzzled look as if to say, “Okay, enough faking it, nothing is really happening here.  This is weird.”  While this took place, my girlfriend was one of the few who remained standing.  She had the guy blow in her ear about five times.  The final time, she fell.  I wrote a note and put it on her Bible and said, “I went back to the dorm, call me when you want me to pick you up, this seems like a cult.”  She called me immediately when I arrived in my room (this was pre-cell phones).  I picked her up.  In the car I rattled off all the scriptures in their pamphlet and showed how they were being abused.  “The prophet said people always fall backwards and have this kind of experience when they are slain, but notice these people always fall forwards,” I continued frustrated and ready to break up with my girlfriend if she disagreed, “also notice: ‘slain in the Spirit’ is not even in the Bible; and where is this idea of being “drunk in the Spirit?”  She said, “Ryan, I fell because he kept pushing me.  Relax.”
.
When I met with my college Pastor, I asked him questions.  I trusted him.  He had a lot to say.  I showed him the pamphlet and how verses were taken out of context.  He didn’t say much, but did say, “When the Spirit comes on you, you will not be able to control it.  But you should never feel like if you do not speak in tongues you are not saved.  That is a kind of abuse.  And notice there are many other kinds of gifts in 1 Corinthians 12, not everyone receives tongues.”
.
Since this time I have been to charismatic bible studies, church services, and I have friends who are charismatic (even some of our congregants are charismatic, and I highly respect them).  And, I believe I have had some genuine “charismatic” experiences.  I believe my back was temporarily healed in 1997 when my college pastor prayed for me.  I felt it instantly relax as he prayed.  Another time I felt the Spirit work powerfully in my inner chest cavity coming up through to my quivering chin as tears streamed down my face as a Korean woman prayed over me through a translator in 2014.  I even had a dream about a month ago in which the Spirit powerfully anointed me in a similar way as I spoke in tongues in my dream (it felt so real – and you, reading this, are only the second person I have told — my own wife will likely learn this for this first time reading these words).
.
So the question is, where should we Christians fall on all this? As a Pastor with an Ecumenical past and a Baptistic present, what should I believe and teach? What matters is not what any one denomination teaches on the subject, what matters is what the Bible says.  And this will be the topic from the pulpit starting February 4th to mid-March.
.
As I prepare and preach, it is my job to remove denominational and experiential bias, and preach what the words mean and allow the Spirit to work among us.
.
As you receive the research I will bring, it is your job to remove denominational and experiential bias, and receive what the Spirit has for you (us).
.
I guarantee the next 6-8 weeks will be uncomfortable.  But necessary to be biblical.
.
Please be in prayer for me that I get it right in my research and delivery.
.
Please be in prayer for us that we respond rightly.
.
GODSPEED

What is God’s will for me?

How does God speak? How does God reveal His will? What does divine will even mean?

In reading the Old Testament, I have contemplated how the Infinite God of the universe, who is Spirit, communicates with finite humans who are confined to a body that each inhabits.  And so, I opened Systematic Theology by Wayne Grudem to find answers, specifically chapter 13 entitled “Communicable Attributes of God (2)”.

First, a communicable attribute is a characteristic God shares with His creation.  For example, you and I are spiritual beings (and God is Spirit); we have knowledge, though limited to what each individual has learned (but God is the source of all knowledge); we have wisdom (though far below that of the Ultimate Wise Creator); we can exhibit truthfulness (yet God is Truth, in Him there is no lie); we can display goodness (but only God is perfectly good); we love (but God is love); we can demonstrate mercy but often with a flawed sense of justice (God’s mercy is a perfect balance to His perfect justice); we can have peace when things are going well (but Jesus, the Prince of Peace supplies peace for us that transcends understanding); we can be in right relationships (but only Jesus and the Holy Spirit are in perfect right relationship with the Father); we can display a sense of protective jealousy (but God’s jealousy perfectly seeks to defend His honor and that of those who need His divine intervention); and we can be wrathful (but only God’s wrath is perfectly just and without sin – see Systematic Theology, pp. 207-209)

The difference between communicable and incommunicable attributes is that incommunicable attributes are characteristics that only God can possess.  They are part of His very nature.  Only God is eternal without beginning or end.  Only God is infinite with respect to space and time.  Only God is omnipresent, in all places at once.  Only God is immutable, unchanging in His nature and character.  Only God is self-existent, nothing created God.  Only God is a perfect unity, without division of will (pp. 181-182).

The above helps answer the question of how He speaks, and how He reveals His will.

God, being Spirit, cannot be seen unless…unless God reveals Himself to finite creatures.

There are reasons based on His perfect wisdom why He would reveal Himself to some and not to others, and He doesn’t have to explain Himself for He is perfectly just, making right decisions.  And when God does reveal Himself to a person, He does it for various reasons to lead to an ultimate end, His glory.

There are distinctions in aspects of God’s will.  There is His necessary will and His free will.  There is His secret will and His revealed will.  Understanding this helps to know how to pray and seek to know Him, His will, and to obey His voice (p. 212).

Necessary will of God:  This includes everything that He must will according to his own nature.  God wills to exist eternally because it is necessary for Him to will it.  To cease to will His existence would not only cause Him to cease to exist, but also it would cause the entire universe (which is dependent on God for order, consistency, and sustainability) to cease to exists (pp. 212-213).  God cannot will Himself to be different from His fundamental nature because His fundamental nature is whom God is, “‘I AM WHO I AM’ says the LORD God.  Tell them, ‘I AM sent me.’” (Exodus 3:14)

Free will of God: This includes all things that God decides to do but that He had no necessity to will according to His nature.  For example, God did not have to create the universe, but He chose to.  He did not have to create people, but for His good pleasure He created us in His image.  After the fall of man, God didn’t have to redeem humanity, but He wanted to.  He decided to create everything that exists and He decided to redeem people out of His own free decision (p. 213).

Secret will of God: There are things that are a mystery and which we will never know unless He chooses to reveal to us.  Deuteronomy 29:29 says, “The secret things belong to the LORD our God; but the things that are revealed belong to us and to our children that we may do all the words of this law.”  A person who knows the “secret things” of God is accountable to God for response to their new found knowledge.  This relates to what follows (p. 213).

Revealed will of God: God’s will that is revealed to a person usually contains a command or precept for our moral conduct (p. 213).  There are aspects of His will that have nothing to do with morals, but when discovered should cause us to bend the knee in worship.  For example the physical laws of the universe.  Five hundred years ago or even fifteen years ago we did not know as much about physics as we do today.  But as we learn more about the Big Bang theory, the speed of light, the origin of the universe, this knowledge causes us to pause in wonder at the glory of God related to creation ex nihilo (out of nothing).

God’s revealed will pertaining to morals has everything to do with prayer and searching the Scriptures as seen below and taught by Christ.

About prayer: When you pray the Lord’s Prayer of Matthew 6:10, you pray a petition, “Your will be done.”  What does this mean? If you run it through what we have learned, it means you are seeking to know God’s secret will — that God would reveal it to you that it would lead to action (pp. 213-214).

We don’t pray “whatever’s going to happen let it happen.”  Jesus was not teaching us to be passive.  He is teaching us to ask God to bring about what He has already decreed in the future (His secret will) and reveal to us what He wants us to do with that information that we would obey His voice (p. 214).

“Your will be done” is a pattern Jesus taught us to pray so that it might lead to action in line with God’s moral law and divine plan.  “…to trust in the secret will of God overcomes pride and expresses humble dependence on God’s sovereign control over the events of our lives.” (p. 214)

GODSPEED

Why get baptized?

“At what age should I baptize my son?” A woman asked about her seven year old.  To which the pastor responded, “When your son can make a credible confession of faith in Jesus Christ all on his own without coaching or help from you as a parent.”

 

This is a question many parents ask.  When in doubt, it is best to delay baptism and continue the dialogue with your children until they fully understand salvation and are desiring, on their own, to be baptized.

 

Each of my children approached me around age seven, all on their own, and said they wanted to be baptized.  I had the conversation with each of them and each time the conversation ended without a firm decision about baptism.  I wanted them to really think about it.  For each of them we had this conversation about 3 or 4 times (always prompted by my child) before I felt they were making a credible confession without my coaching.

 

Currently I am having this continued dialogue with my fourth child.  And, again, this child is seven.  There is something magical about the age of seven.  I don’t know if Ben will be baptized this Sunday, but I am allowing him to feel this out for himself, and he will be baptized when he is ready.

 

If your child wants to be baptized and you are not sure your child is ready, we can meet together and talk about it with your child and discern, together, if your son or daughter is ready.

 

And perhaps it is you; perhaps you as a parent or an adult have not been baptized following up belief.  Perhaps you were in a Catholic or a Lutheran Church, as I was as a baby, and did not make the decision on your own.

 

I faced this dilemma at age 20.  A woman named Judy Pitt asked me if I had been baptized.  I said, “Yes, as a baby.”  She said, “Ryan, that’s not baptism.  That was your parents’ decision.  But biblically it always follows faith.  And you can’t make a profession of faith as a baby.”

 

I was offended.  But I respected Judy, so I was silent on the subject and researched it on my own for months and months.  I was at a Lutheran college, so I was surrounded by people who had been baptized as infants. They had learned from Pastors and Religion Professors at St. Olaf College that, “The Philippian jailer was baptized, he and his whole household, which would have included infants.  Therefore infant baptism is normal and valid.”

 

Common sense told me, “There is no mention of infants in Acts 16.  So how do you know his whole household included ‘infants’?”  No one had a good answer.  So about 9 months after my conversation with Judy Pitt, I had an overwhelming conviction I needed to be baptized.  So at age 21 I was baptized.

 

Did you know that everyone in Europe was baptized as an infant from the 7th century to the 16th century? Until people started reading the Bible in their own language and realized baptism always follows faith.  And so people were baptized again as adults.
To be “baptized again” is the word “Anabaptism.”  Those who were baptized as believers were called “Anabaptists.”  They didn’t baptize their babies, and so their children were called “Baptists” for being baptized only once after belief in Jesus.

 

Did you known that infant baptism was related to State records in Christendom.  This was connected to one’s birth certificate and citizenship. This is one reason Luther didn’t change the Catholic doctrine of infant baptism to believer baptism; that and the fact if he did so the Catholics would forever cut Luther off from the Catholic faith.  Martin Luther compromised what he believed on this holding out hope that Catholics would come around.  He reasoned that baptism doesn’t save you, therefore it is a minor issue and not worth dividing over.
I fully agree with Luther concerning the larger church (Catholics, Lutherans, Methodists, Presbyterians, Anglicans, etc.)  Baptism doesn’t save us, Jesus does.  But this doesn’t diminish the fact that the biblical pattern in Scripture is one believes and then after that was baptized.
Luther died before making an official sacramental change in the Lutheran Church, and thus the German State Church of Lutherans continued infant baptism in connection with citizenship as a German.

 

In the 17th century, there were free churches popping up all over the place; but it was an underground movement.  They had Lutheran roots, but they worshiped in homes, in basements, usually in silent prayer and whispers so as not to alert the authorities.  They were persecuted and eventually came to America.  Today these groups are known as Congregationalists, Baptists, and Evangelical Free.

 

We, Christians, have a rich history.  And seeking to be biblical should be our goal, we should not see this as a legalism (earning salvation), but as discipleship (obey what Jesus commanded).  So when we seek to follow Christ as Christians, let us remember Jesus Christ’s words, “Go, therefore, make disciples of all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I commanded you, and behold I am with you to the end.” (Matthew 28:19-20)

 

I am not a Baptist Pastor first, I am a biblical Christian who happens to be a Pastor who is part of a biblical church seeking to be biblical, that happens to also have Baptistic roots.

 

I love you all.  I share this because of my love for you and desire that we be disciples of Jesus Christ following Him.  Baptism is our public identification with Jesus’ death, burial, and resurrection.
GODSPEED

Communitarianism

Libertarianism vs. Communitarianism:

Government or World Organizations are considered “coercive institutions.”  They exist to “…employ force or the threat of force to control the behavior of their members” according The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (p. 718).  Throughout the ages there is a plurality of opinions (Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Green, Hume, Hegel, Marx, Linen, etc.) about how this “coercive threat” from government should be applied.

Anarchists believe coercive institutions should be replaced by social and economic organizations based on voluntary contractual agreement.  According to anarchist philosopher Blanqui, people are encouraged to resort to violence to overthrow the powers that be in order to create a new system.  (But is this not simply replacing a coercive institution with another?)

John Locke

Liberalism tries to justify coercive institutions by promoting liberty (freedom).  For Locke, liberty requires a constitutional monarchy of parliamentary government.  From here, there are two interpretations of application:libertarianism and welfare-liberalism.

Libertarianism teaches there should be laws that constrain people from doing what they otherwise could do.  From this view, only a “night-watchman state” that protects against force, theft, and fraud can be justified.  (This is the ultimate freedom, because you are truly free so long as your freedom doesn’t impinge on anyone else)

Welfare-liberalism, on the other hand, puts constraints on liberty that prevent people from doing what they otherwise could do.  In other words, “failing to help people in need does restrict their liberty.” (p. 719)  Welfare-liberals maintain it is the role of the state to require a “guaranteed social minimum and equal opportunity…” (p. 719)

Both Libertarians and Welfare-liberals are committed to individualism, and believe the role ofcoercive institutions (such as the State) is to promote those rights.

Communitarianism rejects individualism.  “It maintains that the rights of individuals are not basic and that the collective can have rights that are independent of and even opposed to what liberals claim are rights of individuals.  According to communitarians, individuals are constituted by the institutions and practices of which they are a part, and their rights and obligations derive from those same institutions and practices.” (p. 719)  In plain language, conform to the standard of thecoercive institution and then you have freedom within the standards of the coercive institution to express individualism.  (But this is where freedom begins to be lost, because you have to conform to a social norm in your thoughts and deeds)

Fascism takes this to the next level.  Fascists advocate an Authoritarian State with limited rights for individuals.  An example is National Socialism of Nazi Germany, which was anti-Semitic and militarist.